Council found non-compliant with fire safety actions

April 8, 2024

Council found non-compliant with fire safety actions

From our colleagues at Barbour EHS.

A Yorkshire council has been judged non-compliant with a regulatory standard after the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH) found it had 20,000 fire remedial actions “overdue”.

Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council, which manages around 22,000 homes, referred itself to RSH after it found it had failed to meet health and safety requirements.

The subsequent RSH investigation found 20,000 fixes identified in fire risk assessments – including 200 deemed “high-risk” – had not been carried out in the timeframe required by the council’s own policy.

RSH also found there were more than 1,500 uncompleted repairs relating to damp and mould, and more than 1,000 of these were classed as high-risk, taking into account the needs of tenants living in the homes and the length of time the works were overdue.

The RSH notice said: “Taking into account the seriousness of the issues, the duration that tenants were exposed to risk, and the number of tenants potentially affected, the regulator has concluded that Kirklees MBC has breached the home standard and that there was a risk of serious detriment to tenants during this period.”

RSH said the council has “demonstrated that it now understands its responsibilities” and is taking action to complete the overdue fire safety actions and tackle damp and mould.

Moses Crook, cabinet member for housing at Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council, said: “Over the next few months, we will be recruiting more staff to help increase the pace of delivery across both damp, mould and condensation and fire safety improvements.

“We have several programmes of work already in delivery to resolve actions identified through fire risk assessments and are developing further schemes to address the remainder.”

Housing Today
March 2024

Our Comment

This case illustrates the importance of prioritising and managing property defects, some of which relate to maintaining and improving fire safety standards in tenanted properties.  Introducing a health and safety compliance platform would no doubt help organisations manage their portfolio obligations.   

Fire

Contact

At William Martin, we bring unparalleled health & safety expertise and powerful technology to the table. Whatever your sector and wherever you are, we give you the support you need to keep compliant, strong, and successful.

This content has been produced in association with our sister company, Barbour.

For all enquiries, please contact us or call our team on 0203 819 8829.

Related Posts

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png Approved Document B 2024 amendments May 14, 2024

Approved Document B 2024 amendments

Updated Government guidance calling for second staircases in all new tall residential buildings over 18m.

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png Building Safety Regulator May 13, 2024

Building Safety Regulator Clarifies Design Requirements

The Building Safety Regulator (BSR) has been urged to provide more clarity.

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png landlord jailed May 13, 2024

Landlord Jailed After Fails to Meet Fire Safety Regulations

A landlord has been jailed after she “put the lives and safety of residents & employees at risk”.

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png fire safety breaches May 13, 2024

Significant fines imposed for fire safety breaches

A property management firm has been fined nearly £28,000 for serious breaches of fire safety regs.

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png housing company burns May 13, 2024

Housing Company Fined £500,000 After Worker Suffers Burns

A housing company has been fined £528,000 after an employee suffered burns to his face.

https://wmcompliance.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Barbour-JustIcon-wh.png remove asbestos May 13, 2024

Company ‘makes a shambles’ of asbestos removal

A company based in Kent has been fined £30,000, and its director fined £5,000.